AMD EPYC 9015 vs Intel Xeon Phi 7110X
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9015 with 8 cores 3.6GHz and Intel Xeon Phi 7110X with 61 cores 1.25GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9015 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 1.25GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 22nm)
Lower TDP (125W vs 300W)
Score
General Parameters
Oct 2024
Release Date
Nov 2012
AMD
Manufacturer
PCIe
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Knights Corner
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
PCIe x16
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Generation
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Package
16.63 billions
Transistor Count
5 billions
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
125 W
Power Consumption
300 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
2x70.6 mm²
Die Size
350 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
8
Performance Cores
-
16
Performance Core Threads
-
3.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.25 GHz
4.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
8
Total Core Count
61
16
Total Thread Count
244
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
36.0
Multiplier
12.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
64 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR3,DDR4
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
