AMD EPYC 8324P vs Opteron 148
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz and Opteron 148 with 1 cores 2.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 8324P 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 1 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 400)
Higher base frequency (2.65GHz vs 2.2GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 90nm)
Opteron 148 's Advantages
Lower TDP (85W vs 180W)
Score
General Parameters
Sep 2023
Release Date
Aug 2005
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Siena
Core Architecture
Venus
AMD Socket SP6
Socket
AMD Socket 939
N/A
Integrated Graphics
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))
Generation
Opteron (Venus (E6))
Package
35.5 billions
Transistor Count
0.114 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
90 nm
180 W
Power Consumption
85 W
75 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
TSMC
Foundry
-
4x73 mm²
Die Size
115 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.65 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
32
Total Core Count
1
64
Total Thread Count
1
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
200 MHz
26.5
Multiplier
11.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
128 KB
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR1-400
6
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
-
96
PCIe Lanes
-
