AMD EPYC 7H12 vs Intel Xeon Phi 7250F
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 7H12 with 64 cores 2.6GHz and Intel Xeon Phi 7250F with 68 cores 1.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 7H12 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.6GHz vs 1.4GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 14nm)
Intel Xeon Phi 7250F 's Advantages
Lower TDP (230W vs 280W)
Score
General Parameters
Sep 2019
Release Date
Jun 2016
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Rome
Core Architecture
Knights Landing
AMD Socket SP3
Socket
Intel Socket 3647
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 2 (Rome))
Generation
Xeon Phi (Knights Landing)
Package
3.8 billions
Transistor Count
8 billions
7 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
280 W
Power Consumption
230 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
74 mm²
Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
1.6 GHz
64
Total Core Count
68
128
Total Thread Count
272
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
26.0
Multiplier
14.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4
8
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
4
PCIe Version
-
