AMD EPYC 75F3 vs Intel Xeon Phi 3120A
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 75F3 with 32 cores 2.95GHz and Intel Xeon Phi 3120A with 57 cores 1.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 75F3 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.95GHz vs 1.1GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 22nm)
Lower TDP (280W vs 300W)
Score
General Parameters
Mar 2021
Release Date
Jun 2013
AMD
Manufacturer
PCIe
Server
Type
Server
Milan
Core Architecture
Knights Corner
AMD Socket SP3
Socket
PCIe x16
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 3 (Milan))
Generation
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Package
33.2 billions
Transistor Count
5 billions
7 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
280 W
Power Consumption
300 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
8x81 mm²
Die Size
350 mm²
12 nm
I/O Process Size
-
416 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.95 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
32
Total Core Count
57
64
Total Thread Count
228
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
29.5
Multiplier
11.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
512 KB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
4
Cores per CCD
-
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR3,DDR4
8
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
4
PCIe Version
-
128
PCIe Lanes
-
