AMD EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon X5365
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 73F3 with 16 cores 3.5GHz and Xeon X5365 with 4 cores 3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 73F3 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 3GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 65nm)
Xeon X5365 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 240W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC 73F3
+57%
501
Xeon X5365
319
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC 73F3
+60%
2348
Xeon X5365
1459
General Parameters
Mar 2021
Release Date
Aug 2007
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Milan
Core Architecture
Clovertown
AMD Socket SP3
Socket
Intel Socket 771
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 3 (Milan))
Generation
Xeon (Clovertown)
Package
33.2 billions
Transistor Count
0.582 billions
7 nm
Manufacturing Process
65 nm
240 W
Power Consumption
150 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
63 °C
TSMC
Foundry
-
8x81 mm²
Die Size
2x143 mm²
12 nm
I/O Process Size
-
416 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
3.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3 GHz
4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
16
Total Core Count
4
32
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
333 MHz
35.0
Multiplier
9.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
512 KB per core
L2 Cache
4 MB per die
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
Cores per CCD
-
2
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR2, DDR3
8
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
4
PCIe Version
0
128
PCIe Lanes
-
