AMD EPYC 7371 vs Centaur CHA
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 7371 with 16 cores 3.1GHz and Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 7371 's Advantages
Released 117 years and 10 months late
Higher base frequency (3.1GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 16nm)
Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 2666)
Lower TDP (70W vs 170W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC 7371
+32%
1039
Centaur CHA
786
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC 7371
1848
Centaur CHA
+115%
3982
General Parameters
Nov 2018
Release Date
Jan 1901
AMD
Manufacturer
VIA
Server
Type
Server
Naples
Core Architecture
CHA
AMD Socket SP3
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen (Naples))
Generation
CHA (CNS)
Package
4.8 billions
Transistor Count
-
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
16 nm
170 W
Power Consumption
70 W
85 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
213 mm²
Die Size
195 mm²
CPU Performance
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
16
Total Core Count
8
32
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
31.0
Multiplier
12.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
64 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
2
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
8
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
3
-
PCIe Lanes
44
