AMD EPYC 7313P vs Intel Xeon E5 1607 v2
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 7313P with 16 cores 3GHz and Intel Xeon E5 1607 v2 with 4 cores 3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 7313P 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 1600)
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 10MB)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 22nm)
Intel Xeon E5 1607 v2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 155W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC 7313P
+169%
1445
Intel Xeon E5 1607 v2
536
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC 7313P
+416%
9408
Intel Xeon E5 1607 v2
1820
Blender
AMD EPYC 7313P
+1253%
379
Intel Xeon E5 1607 v2
28
General Parameters
Mar 2021
Release Date
Sep 2013
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Milan
Core Architecture
Ivy Bridge-E
AMD Socket SP3
Socket
Intel Socket 2011
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 3 (Milan))
Generation
Xeon E5 (Ivy Bridge-E)
Package
16.6 billions
Transistor Count
1.86 billions
7 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
155 W
Power Consumption
130 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
70 °C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
4x81 mm²
Die Size
257 mm²
12 nm
I/O Process Size
-
416 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
3 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
16
Total Core Count
4
32
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
30.0
Multiplier
30.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 KB per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
10 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
4
Cores per CCD
-
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR3-1600
8
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
4
PCIe Version
3
128
PCIe Lanes
-
