AMD EPYC 4124P vs Centaur CHA
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 4124P with 4 cores 3.8GHz and Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 4124P 's Advantages
Released 123 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.8GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (32MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 16nm)
Lower TDP (65W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC 4124P
+262%
2849
Centaur CHA
786
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC 4124P
+157%
10246
Centaur CHA
3982
General Parameters
May 2024
Release Date
Jan 1901
AMD
Manufacturer
VIA
Server
Type
Server
Raphael
Core Architecture
CHA
AMD Socket AM5
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
Radeon Graphics
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Raphael))
Generation
CHA (CNS)
Package
6.57 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
16 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
70 W
61 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
71 mm²
Die Size
195 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
122 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
3.8 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
5.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
4
Total Core Count
8
8
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
38.0
Multiplier
12.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
32 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR5-5200
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
2
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
3
28
PCIe Lanes
44
