A10G vs Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM A10G and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
A10G 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
8768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A10G
+2966%
31520
Tesla C2050
1028
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2011
Tesla
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1320 MHz
Base Clock
-
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
14
9216
Shading Units
448
288
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
48
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
164.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
492.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
31.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
985.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
238W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GF100
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
