A10G vs Quadro NVS 295
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM A10G and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
A10G 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
9208 additional rendering cores
Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A10G
+149995%
31520
Quadro NVS 295
21
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
May 2009
Tesla
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1320 MHz
Base Clock
-
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
1
9216
Shading Units
8
288
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
164.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
492.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
31.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
985.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
23W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
G98
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
