3D Rage IIC PCI vs Radeon X1050
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon X1050 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3.200GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Jan 2008
Rage 2
Generation
Radeon R400 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
200 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
128MB
SDR
Memory Type
DDR
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
3.200GB/s
Render Config
1
TMUs
8
1
ROPs
8
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
24W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
RV410
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
R400
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
110 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.12 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
156 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
N/A
OpenGL
2.0
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
