3D Rage IIC PCI vs Radeon R7 360 896SP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 360 896SP 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Jun 2015
Rage 2
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
2GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
14
-
Shading Units
896
1
TMUs
56
1
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
85W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
Tobago
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
Tobago XT
Rage 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
Shader Model
6.3
