3D Rage IIC PCI vs Radeon R7 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Oct 2013
Rage 2
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
1024MB
SDR
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
-
Shading Units
512
1
TMUs
32
1
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
Rage 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
Shader Model
5.1
