3D Rage IIC PCI vs Radeon HD 6350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon HD 6350 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (6.400GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Feb 2011
Rage 2
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
512MB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
-
Shading Units
80
1
TMUs
8
1
ROPs
4
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
19W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
Cedar
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
Rage 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
Shader Model
5.0
