3D Rage IIC PCI vs GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.4GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Unknown
Rage 2
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
1536MB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
-
Shading Units
512
1
TMUs
64
1
ROPs
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.86 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.73 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
1078 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
GF100
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
Rage 2
Architecture
Fermi
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
-
Shader Model
5.1
