3D Rage IIC PCI vs GeForce GT 520 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 520 PCI 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Apr 2011
Rage 2
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
1024MB
SDR
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
1
-
Shading Units
48
1
TMUs
8
1
ROPs
4
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
29W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
GF119
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
GF119-300-A1
Rage 2
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
-
Shader Model
5.1
