3D Rage IIC PCI vs GeForce GT 240
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (54.40GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Nov 2009
Rage 2
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
1024MB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
54.40GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
12
-
Shading Units
96
1
TMUs
32
1
ROPs
8
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
69W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
GT215
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
Rage 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
-
Shader Model
4.1
