3D Rage IIC PCI vs FirePro V3900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Feb 2012
Rage 2
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
1024MB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
Shading Units
480
1
TMUs
24
1
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
Turks
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Rage 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
Shader Model
5.0
