3D Rage IIC PCI vs FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
More VRAM (512GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Apr 2010
Rage 2
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
512MB
SDR
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
-
Shading Units
400
1
TMUs
20
1
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
43W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
Redwood
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Rage 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
Shader Model
5.0
