3D Rage IIC PCI vs FirePro RG220A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
May 2010
Rage 2
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
512MB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
-
Shading Units
80
1
TMUs
8
1
ROPs
4
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
M93
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
TeraScale
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
Shader Model
4.1
