Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs AMD Instinct MI300A

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs AMD Instinct MI300A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
14080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla X2090
1.332 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A +9104%
122.6 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Dec 2023
Tesla
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
228
512
Shading Units
14592
64
TMUs
880
48
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
MI300
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3 billion
Transistors
146 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
760W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy