Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla S2050 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 900W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q +222%
3.318 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
773 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

900W
TDP
40W
1300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy