Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 and 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 58% (1380MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG500 216 +1999%
14.13 TFLOPS
Quadro M600M
0.673 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Aug 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1260 MHz
Base Clock
837 MHz
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
384
320
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

176.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.008 GPixel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
28.26 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
672.8 GFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
21.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
-
Volta
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy