Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1380MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
5112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG500 216 +83017%
14.13 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Nov 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1260 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
8
320
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

176.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
28.26 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.28 GFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
-
Volta
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy