Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M6 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

NVIDIA Tesla M6 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Tesla M6 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M6 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1180MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M6 +214%
3.625 TFLOPS
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
1180 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
512
96
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

75.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
113.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.97 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.625 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1151 GFLOPS
113.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.97 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GM107
GM204-995-A1
GPU Variant
GM107-860-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
45W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy