Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro K4100M +58%
1.627 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2013
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
1152
56
TMUs
96
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.94 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.78 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.627 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.78 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GK104
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
N15E-Q3-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy