Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K40d vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Tesla K40d vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Tesla K40d and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K40d 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2848 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 245W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K40d +6207%
5.046 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Jun 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

745 MHz
Base Clock
-
876 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
2880
Shading Units
32
240
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

52.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
210.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.046 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
1.682 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

245W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy