Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2672 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20X +13468%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Oct 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
2688
Shading Units
16
224
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
21W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy