Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 4GB VRAM Quadro P620 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1443MHz
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 247W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro P620 Mobile +43%
1.478 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1177 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1443 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.09 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.18 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.09 GFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1478 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
46.18 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GP107
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

247W
TDP
40W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy