Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 247W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075 +256%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Dec 2009
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
96
56
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
288.0 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
G92
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

247W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy