Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 238W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050 +19%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GM108
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
Unknown
529 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

238W
TDP
30W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy