Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 +766%
34.1 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A5500 +1272%
5105
Tesla K20Xm
372
OctaneBench
RTX A5500 +846%
596
Tesla K20Xm
63
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1080 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
10240
Shading Units
2688
320
TMUs
224
96
ROPs
48
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

159.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
34.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
34.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
532.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

230W
TDP
235W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy