Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1260MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Max Q +134%
18.71 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

585 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
1260 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

58
SM Count
26
-
Compute Units
-
7424
Shading Units
3328
232
TMUs
104
96
ROPs
48
232
Tensor Cores
104
58
RT Cores
26
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

121.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
292.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
18.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
18.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
292.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA103
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
22 billion
Transistors
12 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy