Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Mobile and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1560MHz vs 1537MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Mobile
6.296 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +128%
14.38 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

832 MHz
Base Clock
1305 MHz
1537 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
4608
64
TMUs
288
48
ROPs
96
64
Tensor Cores
576
16
RT Cores
72
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

73.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
98.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
6.296 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
6.296 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
98.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
754 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy