Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 122W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded +559%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
2.169 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

46
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
5888
Shading Units
1536
184
TMUs
128
96
ROPs
32
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
122W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy