Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1200MHz vs 924MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +322%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
823 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
924 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

26
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3328
Shading Units
1024
104
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.57 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.14 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.892 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.14 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GM204
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy