Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1200MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +347%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

26
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3328
Shading Units
768
104
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
32
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GM206
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy