Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +248%
7.987 TFLOPS
GRID K520Q
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Ampere
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

26
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3328
Shading Units
1536
104
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GK104
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy