Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 238W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded +702%
8.253 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
448
80
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
48
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.1 billion
Unknown
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
238W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy