Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded +2431%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro K500M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.27 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy