Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V7900

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
16896 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation +4806%
91.06 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
May 2011
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

142
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
18176
Shading Units
1280
568
TMUs
80
192
ROPs
32
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
Cayman
AD102
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
608 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy