Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded vs AMD FirePro M2000

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded vs AMD FirePro M2000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
9248 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded +8472%
41.15 TFLOPS
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jul 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1425 MHz
Base Clock
-
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

76
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
9728
Shading Units
480
304
TMUs
24
112
ROPs
8
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

236.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
643.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
41.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
41.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
643.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

120W
TDP
33W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy