Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD FireStream 9250

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
4320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +2204%
23.04 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

40
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
5120
Shading Units
800
160
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy