Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M5100

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M5100

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro M5100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 88% (1455MHz vs 775MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +801%
8.94 TFLOPS
FirePro M5100
0.992 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2013
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
725 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
775 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
3072
Shading Units
640
96
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.40 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.00 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
992.0 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
62.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Venus
-
GPU Variant
Venus XT (216-0846000)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy