Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R5 M465

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R5 M465

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon R5 M465 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 98% (2010MHz vs 1015MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +1220%
10.29 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M465
0.779 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2016
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1015 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
2560
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.120 GPixel/s
160.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.36 GTexel/s
10.29 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
779.5 GFLOPS
160.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Meso
-
GPU Variant
Meso XT (216-0864018)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy