Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R5 M240

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R5 M240

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 M240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 95% (2010MHz vs 1030MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +1461%
10.29 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M240
0.659 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Sep 2014
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1030 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
5
2560
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
20
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.240 GPixel/s
160.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.60 GTexel/s
10.29 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
659.2 GFLOPS
160.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
41.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Jet
-
GPU Variant
Jet XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.69 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy