Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 410M

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 410M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce 410M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 410M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +9254%
10.29 TFLOPS
GeForce 410M
0.11 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 400M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
48
80
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.148 GPixel/s
160.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.592 GTexel/s
10.29 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
110.1 GFLOPS
160.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
9.176 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
N12M-GS
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
12W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy