Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 435 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock 2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +1937%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 435 OEM
0.589 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jun 2016
Quadro Ada
Generation
Arctic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1620MHz
Base Clock
-
2130MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000MHz
Memory Clock
1000MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0 GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00 GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
5
2816
Shading Units
320
88
TMUs
20
48
ROPs
8
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12MB
L2 Cache
128KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.360 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.40 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
588.8 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.80 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18,900 million
Transistors
950 million
159mm²
Die Size
77mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
50W
250W
Suggested PSU
250W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy