Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
2736 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +11438%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6250
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Ada
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
2816
Shading Units
80
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Cedar
-
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
19W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy