Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Intel H3C XG310

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (2130MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +403%
12 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Nov 2020
Quadro Ada
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
768
88
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
24
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
DG1
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
5 nm
Process Size
10 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
159 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy